Solidworks CT2093838

If it is not broken, why correct it? Which is the issue I listen to from engineers, designers, draftsmen, and supervisors making use of 2D CAD computer software in Oklahoma and during the Midwest. Every person has their very own way of carrying out issues, so why swap?

As an Oklahoma engineer, I when questioned the identical issue. When I 1st experimented with SolidWorks 3D CAD Computer software, I was functioning for a company that did tooling for parts. We always ran into trouble with the fit of the end part. Even with a simple design, we usually ran through at least three prototypes.

With 2D design, I could only see limited views of how the parts should fit together. With the information available, I experimented with to predict and correct any potential problems. Yet somehow each time the product went to assembly, the prototype didn't line up as perfectly as the 2D design said it should.

To solve that problem, I began functioning in SolidWorks with the engineers from EngATech. We were able to do a tolerance analysis and fit both the parts together in 3D before making anything. We created a functioning design on the 1st - a hole in one.

SolidWorks allowed us to see potential collision problems before the designs left the drawing board. We could work out the kinks in the design period with no marching out one unsuccessful prototype immediately after one more.

Even so, as a substitute of making me king of a modest island (as I sensed I deserved at that position), they threw a new obstacle at me: upgrading our tooling to accommodate part measurements. With 2D, that is a prolonged and distressing course of action. I would have to stretch each line to the new measurement, line by line by line. If I current the entrance watch, the facet watch would not update. If I current the facet watch, (you guessed it) the entrance watch would not update.

Doing work with EngATech's expertise of SolidWorks, I realized there experienced to be some way to pace up the work. Bidirectional propagation turned out to be the response. Foundation operation of SolidWorks back links measurements during the product and drawings, so that when we stretched one line to six inches... "Eureka!" The relaxation of the product and all drawing views stretched far too. We were able to update all views in minutes relatively than shelling out several hours on the project.

I also discovered the SolidWorks 3D drawing views were also linked back to the modeling views. When I current measurements in the drawings, my 3D product current automatically. And since views are generated automatically from the product, I didn't have to worry about drawing each individual watch! It just made sense.

The symmetry of the 3D approach really hit home when I worked with EngATech on a support structure for a heater. We modeled the structure when, with all the beams. Then we went back and pulled all views directly from the product. The production standard was 16 several hours for an experienced 2D design team. We completed the project in 11 several hours in 3D.

To do the identical project in 2D, I'd have to draw facet views of all the beams, figure out where the beams on the other facet were, incorporate those in the background, line up all holes going through the entrance and back, and line up parts on the entrance to left and right. I would have to draw each individual facet versus dropping out a watch from the existing product.

http://unitec.com/ Solidworks training please visit