ImesFujimoto777

First I'd far better define exactly what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO after comprehensive research and research by qualified specialists have failed to decide the object as any known natural or man-created phenomena. The tag 'unidentified' indicates that the conclusion was that it couldn't have even been a possible or feasible natural or man-produced phenomena, then again what precisely it was remains certainly 'unidentified' and most likely forever unidentifiable. Observational evidence is suggestive that these bona fide UFOs will be extraterrestrial visitations - the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).

One could ague and come to a conclusion that despite the fact that it's possible aliens would stumble over our humble abode in the cosmos, it is really improbable that it would occur inside our lifetime; using the last couple of generations. It's vastly alot more probable a visitation would have happened in ancient times, prehistoric times, maybe millions if not billions of years ago. While there is certainly some thing to be stated for that, there is the counter argument that having visited when, the 'tourist attraction' we call Earth would become ongoing.

Fast forward some billions of years and our alien scientists or explorers (biologists this time) picked up a trilobite or 2 for their interstellar zoo or museum collection. And I'd bet even aliens may possibly have been fascinated using the dinosaurs! Perhaps in our hypothetical interstellar zoo, terrestrial dinosaurs continue to strut their stuff, having suffered a pre-historical UFO abduction!

Alas, the odds any physical evidence of such vastly ancient prehistoric visitations or surveys or expeditions could be so uncommon, eroded away or deeply buried, that such musings will probably forever remain simply wild speculations. All witnesses are extinct nowadays!

But moving from millions of prehistoric years ago to a great deal more current prehistoric eras, up by way of and such as ancient history, say in the last 100,000 years, then we might possibly start off being several significantly more concrete pictorial evidence (cave art) or other archaeological, anthropological or mythological evidence - which not surprisingly brings us towards the topic of 'ancient astronauts'. All I'll say on that's that various of the prevalent literature on the subject is bovine fertilizer or pure balderdash. But I'm not going to be so rash as to go on record as saying all of it is.

There's a song by country-pop singer Shania Twain that goes something such as "That do not impress me significantly". Specifically, as soon as watching 'ancient astronaut' documentaries, or even reading the popular literature, I've in no way been impressed by the monuments argument that aliens either built them or helped humans to construct them - monuments such as Stonehenge or the pyramids (Egyptian or Mesoamerican) or the statutes on Easter Island. That's selling human skills short. I'm as well not impressed with so known as ancient technology - thousands of year old batteries for instance that look about as alien as a Model T Ford.

What does impress me are numerous highly anomalous and alien in appearance historical art works - photos, cave art, paintings, sculptures, etchings, some of big size for example the Nazca line drawings in Peru so not surprisingly designed to be viewed from a high altitude. Also of interest is mythology and comparative mythology that might be suggestive of 'ancient astronauts'. These are legitimate and worthy places for scholarly analysis, given the significance of the subject.

So, why the sudden surge in UFO activity in recent generations - 1947 to date? Well, maybe there hasn't been - a surge which is.