DehavenBuckner179

First I'd superior define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO soon after comprehensive study and study by qualified specialists have failed to establish the object as any known natural or man-produced phenomena. The tag 'unidentified' means that the conclusion was that it couldn't have even been a possible or probable natural or man-made phenomena, still what precisely it was remains definitely 'unidentified' and quite possibly forever unidentifiable. Observational evidence is suggestive that these bona fide UFOs might be extraterrestrial visitations - the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).

One could ague and come to a conclusion that despite the fact that it really is probable aliens would stumble over our humble abode in the cosmos, it really is extremely improbable that it would occur inside our lifetime; with the last few generations. It's vastly additional possible a visitation would have happened in ancient times, prehistoric times, maybe millions if not billions of years ago. While there is certainly something to be said for that, there is the counter argument that having visited as soon as, the 'tourist attraction' we call Earth would turn out to be ongoing.

Fast forward several billions of years and our alien scientists or explorers (biologists this time) picked up a trilobite or 2 for their interstellar zoo or museum collection. And I'd bet even aliens could possibly have been fascinated using the dinosaurs! Perhaps in our hypothetical interstellar zoo, terrestrial dinosaurs continue to strut their stuff, having suffered a pre-historical UFO abduction!

Alas, the odds any physical evidence of such vastly ancient prehistoric visitations or surveys or expeditions would be so uncommon, eroded away or deeply buried, that such musings will probably forever remain simply wild speculations. All witnesses are extinct nowadays!

But moving from millions of prehistoric years ago to far more recent prehistoric eras, up by means of and such as ancient history, say within the last 100,000 years, then we may perhaps start out becoming a few more concrete pictorial evidence (cave art) or other archaeological, anthropological or mythological evidence - which naturally brings us towards the subject of 'ancient astronauts'. All I'll say on that's that lots of of the popular literature on the topic is bovine fertilizer or pure balderdash. But I'm not going to be so rash as to go on record as saying all of it can be.

There's a song by country-pop singer Shania Twain that goes something which include "That do not impress me significantly". Specifically, once watching 'ancient astronaut' documentaries, or even reading the typical literature, I've never been impressed by the monuments argument that aliens either built them or helped humans to construct them - monuments including Stonehenge or the pyramids (Egyptian or Mesoamerican) or the statutes on Easter Island. That's selling human skills short. I'm at the same time not impressed with so referred to as ancient technologies - thousands of year old batteries for instance that look around as alien as a Model T Ford.

What does impress me are a number of particularly anomalous and alien in look historical art works - pictures, cave art, paintings, sculptures, etchings, a couple of of large size for instance the Nazca line drawings in Peru so certainly produced to be viewed from a high altitude. Also of interest is mythology and comparative mythology that is usually suggestive of 'ancient astronauts'. These are legitimate and worthy places for scholarly analysis, given the importance of the subject.

So, why the sudden surge in UFO activity in recent generations - 1947 to date? Well, perhaps there hasn't been - a surge that's.