AlidiaMickle701

First I'd greater define precisely what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO right after comprehensive study and investigation by qualified specialists have failed to decide the object as any recognized natural or man-created phenomena. The tag 'unidentified' means that the conclusion was that it couldn't have even been a feasible or doable natural or man-produced phenomena, on the other hand what precisely it was remains certainly 'unidentified' and most likely forever unidentifiable. Observational evidence is suggestive that these bona fide UFOs is often extraterrestrial visitations - the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).

One may well ague and come to a conclusion that despite the fact that it is probable aliens would stumble more than our humble abode in the cosmos, it is extremely improbable that it would happen within our lifetime; with the last few generations. It's vastly more possible a visitation would have happened in ancient times, prehistoric times, maybe millions if not billions of years ago. While there is certainly some thing to be stated for that, there is the counter argument that having visited as soon as, the 'tourist attraction' we call Earth would become ongoing.

Fast forward several billions of years and our alien scientists or explorers (biologists this time) picked up a trilobite or 2 for their interstellar zoo or museum collection. And I'd bet even aliens might have been fascinated using the dinosaurs! Perhaps in our hypothetical interstellar zoo, terrestrial dinosaurs continue to strut their stuff, having suffered a pre-historical UFO abduction!

Alas, the odds any physical evidence of such vastly ancient prehistoric visitations or surveys or expeditions could be so uncommon, eroded away or deeply buried, that such musings will in all probability forever remain merely wild speculations. All witnesses are extinct currently!

But moving from millions of prehistoric years ago to much more recent prehistoric eras, up through and including ancient history, say in the last 100,000 years, then we may well get started getting some extra concrete pictorial evidence (cave art) or other archaeological, anthropological or mythological evidence - which certainly brings us to the subject of 'ancient astronauts'. All I'll say on that is that countless of the typical literature on the subject is bovine fertilizer or pure balderdash. But I'm not going to be so rash as to go on record as saying all of it really is.

There's a song by country-pop singer Shania Twain that goes some thing for instance "That don't impress me considerably". Specifically, when watching 'ancient astronaut' documentaries, or even reading the frequent literature, I've never been impressed by the monuments argument that aliens either built them or helped humans to develop them - monuments which include Stonehenge or the pyramids (Egyptian or Mesoamerican) or the statutes on Easter Island. That's selling human skills brief. I'm too not impressed with so referred to as ancient technologies - thousands of year old batteries as an example that appear around as alien as a Model T Ford.

What does impress me are a lot of highly anomalous and alien in look historical art works - photos, cave art, paintings, sculptures, etchings, a couple of of significant size such as the Nazca line drawings in Peru so needless to say designed to be viewed from a high altitude. Also of interest is mythology and comparative mythology that may be suggestive of 'ancient astronauts'. These are legitimate and worthy areas for scholarly investigation, given the significance of the subject.

So, why the sudden surge in UFO activity in current generations - 1947 to date? Well, possibly there hasn't been - a surge that is.