ArdyceDesai915

First I'd superior define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO right after comprehensive analysis and analysis by qualified authorities have failed to decide the object as any known natural or man-made phenomena. The tag 'unidentified' indicates that the conclusion was that it couldn't have even been a achievable or feasible natural or man-created phenomena, nevertheless what exactly it was remains certainly 'unidentified' and in all probability forever unidentifiable. Observational evidence is suggestive that these bona fide UFOs is often extraterrestrial visitations - the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).

One may perhaps ague and come to a conclusion that despite the fact that it truly is achievable aliens would stumble more than our humble abode in the cosmos, it's highly improbable that it would take place inside our lifetime; with the last few generations. It's vastly far more feasible a visitation would have happened in ancient times, prehistoric times, possibly millions if not billions of years ago. While there is certainly some thing to be stated for that, there is the counter argument that having visited as soon as, the 'tourist attraction' we call Earth would become ongoing.

Fast forward some billions of years and our alien scientists or explorers (biologists this time) picked up a trilobite or 2 for their interstellar zoo or museum collection. And I'd bet even aliens might possibly have been fascinated using the dinosaurs! Perhaps in our hypothetical interstellar zoo, terrestrial dinosaurs continue to strut their stuff, having suffered a pre-historical UFO abduction!

Alas, the odds any physical evidence of such vastly ancient prehistoric visitations or surveys or expeditions could be so uncommon, eroded away or deeply buried, that such musings will likely forever remain simply wild speculations. All witnesses are extinct today!

But moving from millions of prehistoric years ago to even more recent prehistoric eras, up via and which includes ancient history, say within the last 100,000 years, then we may possibly begin becoming several a lot more concrete pictorial evidence (cave art) or other archaeological, anthropological or mythological evidence - which not surprisingly brings us to the topic of 'ancient astronauts'. All I'll say on which is that many of the frequent literature on the subject is bovine fertilizer or pure balderdash. But I'm not going to be so rash as to go on record as saying all of it really is.

There's a song by country-pop singer Shania Twain that goes some thing like "That do not impress me significantly". Specifically, once watching 'ancient astronaut' documentaries, or even reading the widespread literature, I've never ever been impressed by the monuments argument that aliens either built them or helped humans to construct them - monuments which include Stonehenge or the pyramids (Egyptian or Mesoamerican) or the statutes on Easter Island. That's selling human abilities brief. I'm also not impressed with so known as ancient technologies - thousands of year old batteries as an example that appear about as alien as a Model T Ford.

What does impress me are various exceptionally anomalous and alien in appearance historical art works - photos, cave art, paintings, sculptures, etchings, several of major size for instance the Nazca line drawings in Peru so not surprisingly created to be viewed from a high altitude. Also of interest is mythology and comparative mythology that might be suggestive of 'ancient astronauts'. These are legitimate and worthy locations for scholarly investigation, given the importance of the topic.

So, why the sudden surge in UFO activity in recent generations - 1947 to date? Well, perhaps there hasn't been - a surge that's.